A Quote by U.S. Supreme Court on clarity, contentment, facts, order, and speech
[The Communications Decency Act] lacks the precision that the First Amendment requires when a statute regulates the content of speech. In order to deny minors access to potentially harmful speech, the CDA effectively suppresses a large amount of speech that adults have a constitutional right to receive and to address to one another.... In evaluating the free speech rights of adults, we have made it perfectly clear that sexual expression which is indecent but not obscene is protected by the First Amendment. Where obscenity is not involved, we have consistently held that the fact that protected speech may be offensive to some does not justify its suppression.
Source: 1997, Janet Reno et al. v. ACLU et al. [Interior quotes and citations omitted]
Contributed by: Zaady